AppWanderer
Home / Categories / Stickers
Standing category report · rewritten 3 Sep 2026

Stickers, by the numbers

What 4,054 tracked stickers apps reveal about how the category prices, concentrates, and competes — computed from public metadata, not estimated.

Machine-drafted · figures checked against the index · edited to standards set by Dor Bass · Figures: direct listing fields · Figures as of 3 Sep 2026 · 3 min read

Computed from public Apple App Store metadata across 4,054 tracked stickers apps; no figure is estimated. How we compute this →

Apps tracked
4,054
Median rating
4.1
Paid share
67.4%
Median size
8 MB

Mochj Cat is the single most-rated app in Stickers, all on its own, with 6,464 ratings. That's nearly identical to the 6,569 ratings Arturo Estrada De Leon has racked up across his entire 57-app catalog, good for 10.2% of every rating in the category. One app is basically matching fifty-seven. Volume clearly isn't what drives this category: a single sticker pack can outrun a publisher's whole back catalog. Pricing tells a similar story about low stakes. Paid apps outnumber free ones across the 4,054 tracked titles, 67.4% to 32.6%, but nobody's charging real money for any of it. 1,924 apps sit in the $0.01-0.99 band, another 749 in the $1-2.99 band, only 13 cross into $5-9.99, and just one app asks for $10 or more.

Zoom in on the publishers with the most apps and the picture gets worse. kazuya fujinami has shipped 69 apps but collected only 31 ratings, under 0.1% of the category total. kupaberu isn't far behind: 64 apps, 25 ratings, the same negligible share. Sergei Fomichev (56 apps, 23 ratings), leehwa ko (56 apps, 6 ratings), and Anass Sebaaoui (54 apps, 6 ratings) round out the top six by app count, each stuck under 0.1% of category ratings too. Arturo Estrada De Leon breaks the pattern here, the only publisher in this group whose output actually turned into attention. The top three publishers by app count control 10.2% of all ratings between them, and nearly all of that comes from just one of the three. Publishers flooding the store with sticker packs fill shelf space. Nobody's actually looking at it.

The winners by rating volume aren't the big licensed names. Super Mario Run Stickers, presumably backed by real IP muscle, sits at 1,277 ratings, well behind FunStick: Stickers & Emojis (5,168), Aminal Stickers (5,085), and Tap Anime Color (3,689). Swapper: Reverse Text Bubbles sits close behind Mochj Cat at 6,304 ratings. These are functional novelties, not franchises: a tool that flips text in a bubble, an app that reverses yes and no answers (Yes No Reverse Stickers Maker, 1,141 ratings), an anime color pack. Users are rewarding the gag here, not the license.

The median rating across the category sits at 4.1, decent but nothing special, against a median download size of just 7.9 MB. Nobody's bloating a sticker pack: 3,916 apps stay under 50 MB, only 137 land between 50 and 200 MB, and exactly one app crosses into the 200 to 500 MB range. That's about as lean as an App Store category gets. Still, the rating spread among the 1,814 rated apps shows quality has nothing to do with file size: 999 apps sit at 4.5 stars or higher, while 297 sit below 3.0. A small file size says nothing about whether the stickers themselves are any good.

Maintenance is where the category thins out. Only 1,157 of the 4,054 tracked apps shipped an update in the last 12 months, so most sticker packs sit frozen once published. The ratings data doesn't suggest that costs much, though: files this small, 7.9 MB median, nothing over 500 MB, don't demand constant updates, and the leaders by rating volume aren't the newest apps in the store either.

For anyone picking a sticker app, this data points somewhere specific. Skip publishers padding their catalog with dozens of near-invisible titles: kazuya fujinami's 69 apps and 31 ratings, or leehwa ko's 56 apps and 6 ratings, aren't signs of quality. They show a publisher throwing packs at the wall and seeing what sticks. Look instead at raw rating volume: Mochj Cat's 6,464, Swapper's 6,304, or FunStick's 5,168 come closest to an actual track record in this category. Expect to pay in the $0.01-0.99 or $1-2.99 bands, since 1,924 and 749 apps respectively sit there, and expect a file under 50 MB too. Don't weigh a recent update too heavily either. Most of the category hasn't had one in a year, and the ratings leaders got there without it.

This commentary is machine-drafted from the computed figures shown on this page. Before publication it is checked automatically against those figures, rejected if it states a number the data does not support, reads as drafting notes, or stops mid-sentence — and withheld entirely if it fails. See our editorial standards.

This written summary was compiled 3 Sep 2026; the figures in the tables below are live and may differ slightly as the index changes.

How the category prices

Free1,322
$0.01–0.991,924
$1–2.99749
$3–4.9945
$5–9.9913
$10+1
Unknown0

67.4% of tracked apps carry a price; the rest are free (in-app purchase and subscription pricing are not visible to us).

Where the ratings concentrate

kazuya fujinami69 apps · 31
kupaberu64 apps · 25
Arturo Estrada De Leon57 apps · 6,569
Sergei Fomichev56 apps · 23
leehwa ko56 apps · 6
Anass Sebaaoui54 apps · 6

Bar length is each publisher's share of ratings; the app count beside it shows how few apps that reach can rest on. Publishers are the store's own IDs — corporate parents are not merged, so concentration reads conservative.

The leaders

AppPublisherRatingRatings
Mochj Cat Luu Thi Tuyet Minh 4.8 6,464
Swapper: Reverse Text Bubbles Arturo Estrada De Leon 1.5 6,304
FunStick: Stickers & Emojis Daily Stickers Zone 4.2 5,168
Aminal Stickers Ronnie Nguyen 4.6 5,085
Tap Anime Color Brilliant Games 4.8 3,689
Super Mario Run Stickers Nintendo Co., Ltd. 3.9 1,277
Anime Art Brilliant Games 4.8 1,203
Yes No Reverse Stickers Maker Cao Tran 1.4 1,141
What this report cannot tell you
We measure public listing metadata: prices, ratings, sizes, publishers. We cannot see downloads, revenue, active users, or retention, and we do not estimate them. Ratings reflect lifetime accumulation, not current popularity, and in-app pricing is invisible to us.