AppWanderer
Home / Categories / Social Networking
Standing category report · rewritten 3 Sep 2026

Social Networking, by the numbers

What 15,868 tracked social networking apps reveal about how the category prices, concentrates, and competes — computed from public metadata, not estimated.

Machine-drafted · figures checked against the index · edited to standards set by Dor Bass · Figures: direct listing fields · Figures as of 3 Sep 2026 · 3 min read

Computed from public Apple App Store metadata across 15,868 tracked social networking apps; no figure is estimated. How we compute this →

Apps tracked
15,868
Median rating
4.4
Paid share
2.8%
Median size
67 MB

Facebook racked up 28,131,573 ratings in this category, outpacing WhatsApp Messenger and Messenger combined, which sit at 18,516,436 and 13,460,332. Those three names alone account for most of the weight across 15,868 tracked apps. Social Networking basically runs on free downloads: 15,415 of those apps charge nothing, 97.2% of the total, and only 450 apps, 2.8%, ask for any money at all. Paid tiers thin out fast the higher you climb: 179 apps sit between $0.01 and $0.99, 154 land in the $1 to $2.99 range, 66 fall between $3 and $4.99, 33 sit in $5 to $9.99, and just 18 charge $10 or more. Nobody's charging real money for a social network here. The money comes from attention and data, not from a checkout screen.

Ratings pile up unevenly, and the publishers with the biggest catalogs make that obvious. Create Community lists 104 apps and has pulled in just 41 ratings total. EKLESIA SOLUCOES PARA IGREJAS LTDA runs 74 apps with 2 ratings, Almashines runs 71 apps with 4, Evangelisch methodistische Kirche (SJK) runs 71 apps with zero, Bund FeG runs 68 apps with zero, and Yazo runs 64 apps with 2. Add up the top three of those publishers and you get less than 0.1% of all 113,647,970 ratings the category has ever recorded. Cranking out dozens of near-identical apps buys you nothing here. It won't earn a single star, let alone a following.

The apps that actually rack up ratings follow a pattern: communication beats discovery. Discord - Talk, Play, Hang Out holds 3,530,711 ratings, Google Meet has 2,332,568, Threads has 2,204,014, and Marco Polo - Video Messenger has 2,158,600. The fifth name on this list isn't a chat app at all: Life360: Family Safety & GPS has 3,034,558 ratings, putting it ahead of Google Meet, Threads, and Marco Polo. In this category, you earn ratings by solving one concrete problem, whether that's talking to a friend, joining a work call, or knowing where your kid is.

The median rating across 7,906 rated apps sits at 4.4, which looks solid until you check what's underneath. 4,216 apps hold 4.5 stars or higher, while 909 fall below 3.0. Those low scores belong to apps people actively dislike, not apps nobody noticed. File size tells a calmer story: the median download runs 66.8 MB, and most apps stay light, with 6,527 apps under 50 MB and 8,246 landing between 50 and 200 MB. Only 1,013 apps run 200 to 500 MB, and just 82 cross the 500 MB mark. Social Networking hasn't ballooned into a bloated category.

Maintenance looks decent on paper: 10,685 of the 15,868 tracked apps shipped an update in the last 12 months, leaving 5,183 apps untouched for at least a year. A lot of those stale listings probably trace back to the same small church-app and template publishers padding the app-count leaderboard, so the number makes sense. Publishers rarely bother pulling down an app that costs nothing to leave sitting there.

If you're picking a social app, these numbers actually tell you something. Price won't help much, since 97.2% of the category costs nothing anyway. Rating volume tells you more: Facebook, WhatsApp Messenger, and Messenger didn't reach tens of millions of ratings by accident, and that kind of scale usually means the basics work. Scale isn't the only path, though. Life360 shows that a narrow, specific use case can out-rate general-purpose video apps. The real risk here isn't picking a bad big name, it's landing on one of the thousands of small, unrated, unmaintained apps sitting behind the leaders, the ones with 0 or 2 ratings and no update in a year.

This commentary is machine-drafted from the computed figures shown on this page. Before publication it is checked automatically against those figures, rejected if it states a number the data does not support, reads as drafting notes, or stops mid-sentence — and withheld entirely if it fails. See our editorial standards.

This written summary was compiled 3 Sep 2026; the figures in the tables below are live and may differ slightly as the index changes.

How the category prices

Free15,415
$0.01–0.99179
$1–2.99154
$3–4.9966
$5–9.9933
$10+18
Unknown3

2.8% of tracked apps carry a price; the rest are free (in-app purchase and subscription pricing are not visible to us).

Where the ratings concentrate

Create Community104 apps · 41
EKLESIA SOLUCOES PARA IGREJAS LTDA74 apps · 2
Almashines71 apps · 4
Evangelisch methodistische Kirche (SJK)71 apps · 0
Bund FeG68 apps · 0
Yazo64 apps · 2

Bar length is each publisher's share of ratings; the app count beside it shows how few apps that reach can rest on. Publishers are the store's own IDs — corporate parents are not merged, so concentration reads conservative.

The leaders

AppPublisherRatingRatings
Facebook Meta Platforms, Inc. 4.5 28,131,573
WhatsApp Messenger WhatsApp Inc. 4.7 18,516,436
Messenger Meta Platforms, Inc. 4.7 13,460,332
Discord - Talk, Play, Hang Out Discord Inc. 4.7 3,530,711
Life360: Family Safety & GPS Life360 4.8 3,034,558
Google Meet Google 4.8 2,332,568
Threads Instagram, Inc. 4.6 2,204,014
Marco Polo - Video Messenger Joya Communications 4.8 2,158,600
What this report cannot tell you
We measure public listing metadata: prices, ratings, sizes, publishers. We cannot see downloads, revenue, active users, or retention, and we do not estimate them. Ratings reflect lifetime accumulation, not current popularity, and in-app pricing is invisible to us.