Application record · ID 6474323148
- Average rating
- 4.8
- 28.1K ratings
- Ratings
- 28.1K
- On store since
- 2025
- 1 yr 106 d
- Languages
- 17
Analyst summary
Last verified 17 Aug 2026mo.co is a Games application published by Supercell. It holds a 4.8-star average across 28,052 public ratings.
It is actively maintained: the most recent update we observed shipped 1 Jul 2026. The listing has been on the store for 1 yr 106 d.
On the listing it is localized into 17 languages, a 3.5 GB download, runs on iPhone 5s and newer · iPad.
Position in category
Each bar shows where mo.co sits in the distribution of Games apps we track. Percentiles are computed over apps with the field observed, not the whole category.
Distribution computed with the category report · Full category report
Review intelligence
Medium confidenceUsers report progress resets and poor PVP, but some enjoy the gameplay and want controller support.
This game is fun but I desperately want an endless mode that gets harder the longer you survive, and mods for weapons to have more customization between weapons
Worst PVP of any mobile game you will play. Don't touch it.
Trajectory: declining · recomputed when new reviews arrive · limitations
Health timeline
A dated record of what has actually happened to this app — launch, updates, price moves and record-board milestones. Every point is a stored observation, never an estimate.
- 13 Jul 2026 Board Entered The Biggest Free App Best position observed: #20.
- 13 Jul 2026 Board Entered Massive But Loved Best position observed: #9.
- 1 Jul 2026 Update Updated to v12.10.4 The most recent version we observed on the listing.
- 17 Mar 2025 Launch Launched on the App Store Original release date stated on the listing.
Dates are read from the listing and from our own daily observations; the rating curve accrues going forward. How we track.
Listing & advisories
Download size
3.5 GB
Minimum iOS
17.0
Devices supported
iPhone 5s and newer · iPad
Age rating
9+
Advisories
Infrequent/Mild Cartoon or Fantasy Violence
Screenshots
8 on the listing
Screenshots are hotlinked from the public store listing and belong to the publisher.
Rankings this app appears on
Peer set
Peers are well-rated apps in Games, selected by category and rating — not by similarity of description, so the comparison is like-for-like on scale.
| App | Rating | Ratings | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| mo.co | 4.8 | 28.1K | Free |
| WATER BIKE STUNT RACE GAMES 3D | 5.0 | 1,946 | Free |
| Shap10r | 5.0 | 7,613 | Free |
| Word Connect Zen: Word Puzzle | 5.0 | 1,165 | Free |
| Balatro | 5.0 | 104.8K | $6.99 |
| Bible Word Search - Word Game | 5.0 | 97.6K | Free |
| Bible Crossword Game | 5.0 | 14.5K | Free |
Questions this record can answer
How was every figure on this page produced?
Each figure is read from public App Store metadata or computed from it, dated to when we read it, and traceable to a stored row. Percentiles, cadence, longevity and sentiment are derived by us; ratings, prices, sizes and dates are taken as the store reports them.
Why can the star average and recent opinion disagree?
The star average is cumulative over the app’s whole life, so recent opinion barely moves it. Any sentiment figure we compute reads only recent review text, which is why it turns first. Treat a divergence as an early indicator, not a verdict.
What can this page not tell you?
Downloads, revenue, active users, subscription pricing inside the app, and anything about security or data handling. None of those are visible in public store metadata, so we do not estimate them.
Provenance
- Source
- Public App Store listing metadata and public customer reviews.
- Collection window
- Last read 17 Aug 2026. Listing re-read daily; reviews re-read on a slower cadence.
- Derived figures
- Percentiles, update cadence, longevity and sentiment are computed by us, not supplied by the store.
- Corrections
- No corrections on this record. Report an error
This record is excluded from search indexes and the sitemap, and carries no advertising. It exists so that figures used in our published analysis can be checked at source. Why we do this