Application record · ID 322420483
Dazed Magazine
by Waddell Ltd · Magazines & Newspapers · Free
- Average rating
- 5.0
- 1 ratings
- Ratings
- 1
- On store since
- 2010
- 15 yrs 136 d
- Languages
- 3
Analyst summary
Last verified 4 Aug 2026Dazed Magazine is a Magazines & Newspapers application published by Waddell Ltd. It holds a 5.0-star average across 1 public ratings.
It was last updated 16 Dec 2025. The listing has been on the store for 15 yrs 136 d.
On the listing it is localized into 3 languages, a 3.0 MB download, runs on iPhone 5s and newer · iPad.
Position in category
Each bar shows where Dazed Magazine sits in the distribution of Magazines & Newspapers apps we track. Percentiles are computed over apps with the field observed, not the whole category.
Distribution computed with the category report · Full category report
Review intelligence
Low confidenceUsers love the magazine but find the app slow and missing back issues.
This is a bad example of a lazy tablet mag. Slow to load, nothing exclusive, and zero interactivity. Love the print but I'd expect more...
Trajectory: stable · recomputed when new reviews arrive · limitations
Health timeline
A dated record of what has actually happened to this app — launch, updates, price moves and record-board milestones. Every point is a stored observation, never an estimate.
- 13 Jul 2026 Board Entered Oldest Survivor in Magazines & Newspapers Best position observed: #10.
- 16 Dec 2025 Update Updated to v15.0.3 The most recent version we observed on the listing.
- 6 Aug 2010 Launch Launched on the App Store Original release date stated on the listing.
Dates are read from the listing and from our own daily observations; the rating curve accrues going forward. How we track.
Listing & advisories
Download size
3.0 MB
Minimum iOS
16.6
Devices supported
iPhone 5s and newer · iPad
Age rating
12+
Advisories
Infrequent/Mild Profanity or Crude Humor · Infrequent/Mild Alcohol, Tobacco, or Drug Use or References · Infrequent/Mild Mature/Suggestive Themes · Infrequent/Mild Sexual Content and Nudity
Screenshots
7 on the listing
Screenshots are hotlinked from the public store listing and belong to the publisher.
Rankings this app appears on
Peer set
Peers are well-rated apps in Magazines & Newspapers, selected by category and rating — not by similarity of description, so the comparison is like-for-like on scale.
| App | Rating | Ratings | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dazed Magazine | 5.0 | 1 | Free |
| Word Among Us Mass Edition | 4.9 | 12.3K | Free |
| Lion's Roar | 4.9 | 1,624 | Free |
| Poetry Magazine App | 4.9 | 1,348 | Free |
| 大圆镜 | 4.9 | 1,331 | Free |
| London Review of Books | 4.9 | 3,216 | Free |
| MAGA - Trump Tracker App | 4.9 | 2,009 | Free |
Questions this record can answer
How was every figure on this page produced?
Each figure is read from public App Store metadata or computed from it, dated to when we read it, and traceable to a stored row. Percentiles, cadence, longevity and sentiment are derived by us; ratings, prices, sizes and dates are taken as the store reports them.
Why can the star average and recent opinion disagree?
The star average is cumulative over the app’s whole life, so recent opinion barely moves it. Any sentiment figure we compute reads only recent review text, which is why it turns first. Treat a divergence as an early indicator, not a verdict.
What can this page not tell you?
Downloads, revenue, active users, subscription pricing inside the app, and anything about security or data handling. None of those are visible in public store metadata, so we do not estimate them.
Provenance
- Source
- Public App Store listing metadata and public customer reviews.
- Collection window
- Last read 4 Aug 2026. Listing re-read daily; reviews re-read on a slower cadence.
- Derived figures
- Percentiles, update cadence, longevity and sentiment are computed by us, not supplied by the store.
- Corrections
- No corrections on this record. Report an error
This record is excluded from search indexes and the sitemap, and carries no advertising. It exists so that figures used in our published analysis can be checked at source. Why we do this