AppWanderer
Social Networking/ iDaily Corp./ MyLove · 爱情介绍所 Evidence record · not search-indexed, no advertising

Application record · ID 1166624811

MyLove · 爱情介绍所 app icon

MyLove · 爱情介绍所

by iDaily Corp. · Social Networking · Free

Average rating
4.4
82 ratings
Ratings
82
On store since
2017
1 yr 272 d
Languages
4
01

Analyst summary

Last verified 4 Aug 2026

MyLove · 爱情介绍所 is a Social Networking application published by iDaily Corp.. It holds a 4.4-star average across 82 public ratings.

We have observed no update since 9 Nov 2018. The listing has been on the store for 1 yr 272 d.

On the listing it is localized into 4 languages, a 69.2 MB download, runs on iPhone 5s and newer · iPad.

A summary of the measured figures recorded on this page, kept current as the numbers change.
02

Position in category

Each bar shows where MyLove · 爱情介绍所 sits in the distribution of Social Networking apps we track. Percentiles are computed over apps with the field observed, not the whole category.

Rating volume 51st pct.
Average rating 50th pct.
Download size 51st pct.
Price 5th pct.

Distribution computed with the category report · Full category report

03

Health timeline

A dated record of what has actually happened to this app — launch, updates, price moves and record-board milestones. Every point is a stored observation, never an estimate.

Daily rating & price tracking began 9 Aug 2026; the growth curve fills in here as observations accrue.

  1. 9 Nov 2018 Update Updated to v0.3 The most recent version we observed on the listing.
  2. 9 Feb 2017 Launch Launched on the App Store Original release date stated on the listing.

Dates are read from the listing and from our own daily observations; the rating curve accrues going forward. How we track.

04

Listing & advisories

Download size

69.2 MB

Minimum iOS

9.3

Devices supported

iPhone 5s and newer · iPad

Age rating

17+

Advisories

Frequent/Intense Mature/Suggestive Themes · Infrequent/Mild Sexual Content and Nudity

Screenshots

5 on the listing

MyLove · 爱情介绍所 screenshot MyLove · 爱情介绍所 screenshot MyLove · 爱情介绍所 screenshot MyLove · 爱情介绍所 screenshot MyLove · 爱情介绍所 screenshot

Screenshots are hotlinked from the public store listing and belong to the publisher.

05

Peer set

Peers are well-rated apps in Social Networking, selected by category and rating — not by similarity of description, so the comparison is like-for-like on scale.

AppRatingRatingsPrice
MyLove · 爱情介绍所 4.4 82 Free
Adoraboo - Raise Boos Together 4.9 33.6K Free
Widgetable: Besties & Couples 4.9 380.4K Free
buz - voice connects 4.9 18.7K Free
FamyTale – семейное древо 4.9 4,804 Free
Waveful - Become a Creator 4.9 1,681 Free
Radiate 4.9 29.5K Free
06

Questions this record can answer

How was every figure on this page produced?

Each figure is read from public App Store metadata or computed from it, dated to when we read it, and traceable to a stored row. Percentiles, cadence, longevity and sentiment are derived by us; ratings, prices, sizes and dates are taken as the store reports them.

Why can the star average and recent opinion disagree?

The star average is cumulative over the app’s whole life, so recent opinion barely moves it. Any sentiment figure we compute reads only recent review text, which is why it turns first. Treat a divergence as an early indicator, not a verdict.

What can this page not tell you?

Downloads, revenue, active users, subscription pricing inside the app, and anything about security or data handling. None of those are visible in public store metadata, so we do not estimate them.

07

Provenance

Source
Public App Store listing metadata and public customer reviews.
Collection window
Last read 4 Aug 2026. Listing re-read daily; reviews re-read on a slower cadence.
Derived figures
Percentiles, update cadence, longevity and sentiment are computed by us, not supplied by the store.
Corrections
No corrections on this record. Report an error

This record is excluded from search indexes and the sitemap, and carries no advertising. It exists so that figures used in our published analysis can be checked at source. Why we do this