Application record · ID 493390354
Kaiser Permanente
by Kaiser Permanente · Health & Fitness · Free
- Average rating
- 4.8
- 1.1M ratings
- Ratings
- 1.1M
- On store since
- 2012
- 14 yrs 91 d
- Languages
- 10
Analyst summary
Last verified 8 Aug 2026Kaiser Permanente is a Health & Fitness application published by Kaiser Permanente. It holds a 4.8-star average across 1,059,751 public ratings.
It is actively maintained: the most recent update we observed shipped 4 Aug 2026. The listing has been on the store for 14 yrs 91 d.
On the listing it is localized into 10 languages, a 381 MB download, runs on iPhone 5s and newer · iPad.
Position in category
Each bar shows where Kaiser Permanente sits in the distribution of Health & Fitness apps we track. Percentiles are computed over apps with the field observed, not the whole category.
Distribution computed with the category report · Full category report
Review intelligence
High confidenceUsers report mixed experiences with app performance and pharmacy services, with some finding it easy to use and others experiencing significant issues.
They do a great job getting the mail out prescriptions to me on time as well as great online communication!
Disappointed with appointment availability. Third world service.
Trajectory: stable · recomputed when new reviews arrive · limitations
Health timeline
A dated record of what has actually happened to this app — launch, updates, price moves and record-board milestones. Every point is a stored observation, never an estimate.
- 4 Aug 2026 Update Updated to v7.10 The most recent version we observed on the listing.
- 13 Jul 2026 Board Entered Health & Fitness Kings Best position observed: #6.
- 7 May 2012 Launch Launched on the App Store Original release date stated on the listing.
Dates are read from the listing and from our own daily observations; the rating curve accrues going forward. How we track.
Listing & advisories
Download size
381 MB
Minimum iOS
18.0
Devices supported
iPhone 5s and newer · iPad
Age rating
12+
Advisories
Infrequent/Mild Medical/Treatment Information
Screenshots
7 on the listing
Screenshots are hotlinked from the public store listing and belong to the publisher.
Rankings this app appears on
Peer set
Peers are well-rated apps in Health & Fitness, selected by category and rating — not by similarity of description, so the comparison is like-for-like on scale.
| App | Rating | Ratings | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kaiser Permanente | 4.8 | 1.1M | Free |
| Shred415 Fitness | 5.0 | 2,582 | Free |
| MADabolic 2.0 | 5.0 | 2,544 | Free |
| The Hot Room 2.0 | 5.0 | 1,081 | Free |
| SPENGA 2.0 | 5.0 | 12.7K | Free |
| Fasting Tracker • Easy Fast | 5.0 | 8,329 | Free |
| ISI Elite Training | 5.0 | 7,341 | Free |
Questions this record can answer
How was every figure on this page produced?
Each figure is read from public App Store metadata or computed from it, dated to when we read it, and traceable to a stored row. Percentiles, cadence, longevity and sentiment are derived by us; ratings, prices, sizes and dates are taken as the store reports them.
Why can the star average and recent opinion disagree?
The star average is cumulative over the app’s whole life, so recent opinion barely moves it. Any sentiment figure we compute reads only recent review text, which is why it turns first. Treat a divergence as an early indicator, not a verdict.
What can this page not tell you?
Downloads, revenue, active users, subscription pricing inside the app, and anything about security or data handling. None of those are visible in public store metadata, so we do not estimate them.
Provenance
- Source
- Public App Store listing metadata and public customer reviews.
- Collection window
- Last read 8 Aug 2026. Listing re-read daily; reviews re-read on a slower cadence.
- Derived figures
- Percentiles, update cadence, longevity and sentiment are computed by us, not supplied by the store.
- Corrections
- No corrections on this record. Report an error
This record is excluded from search indexes and the sitemap, and carries no advertising. It exists so that figures used in our published analysis can be checked at source. Why we do this