Application record · ID 300814524
CompareMe Price Comparison
by codedifferent · Shopping · Free
- Average rating
- 4.8
- 74 ratings
- Ratings
- 74
- On store since
- 2009
- 17 yrs 196 d
- Languages
- 6
Analyst summary
Last verified 7 Aug 2026CompareMe Price Comparison is a Shopping application published by codedifferent. It holds a 4.8-star average across 74 public ratings.
It is actively maintained: the most recent update we observed shipped 16 Jul 2026. The listing has been on the store for 17 yrs 196 d.
On the listing it is localized into 6 languages, a 7.3 MB download, runs on iPhone 5s and newer · iPad.
Position in category
Each bar shows where CompareMe Price Comparison sits in the distribution of Shopping apps we track. Percentiles are computed over apps with the field observed, not the whole category.
Distribution computed with the category report · Full category report
Review intelligence
Medium confidenceUsers find the app very useful for comparing prices and saving money and time, with most finding it easy to use.
This app helps to determine the deal... which surprised me to learn sales aren't always the best deal. Use it at every grocery store visit. My kids use it when we shop now too.
Whenever I enter the price it automatically Closes the app:(((((
Trajectory: stable · recomputed when new reviews arrive · limitations
Health timeline
A dated record of what has actually happened to this app — launch, updates, price moves and record-board milestones. Every point is a stored observation, never an estimate.
- 16 Jul 2026 Update Updated to v4.0.2 The most recent version we observed on the listing.
- 13 Jul 2026 Board Entered Oldest Survivor in Shopping Best position observed: #3.
- 5 Jan 2009 Launch Launched on the App Store Original release date stated on the listing.
Dates are read from the listing and from our own daily observations; the rating curve accrues going forward. How we track.
Listing & advisories
Download size
7.3 MB
Minimum iOS
26.0
Devices supported
iPhone 5s and newer · iPad
Age rating
4+
Advisories
None listed by the publisher
Screenshots
5 on the listing
Screenshots are hotlinked from the public store listing and belong to the publisher.
Rankings this app appears on
Peer set
Peers are well-rated apps in Shopping, selected by category and rating — not by similarity of description, so the comparison is like-for-like on scale.
| App | Rating | Ratings | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| CompareMe Price Comparison | 4.8 | 74 | Free |
| Prozis Store | 5.0 | 2,013 | Free |
| IKEA 宜家家居 | 5.0 | 403.2K | Free |
| Stamp Me | 5.0 | 2,306 | Free |
| Quince: Luxury Essentials | 5.0 | 8,351 | Free |
| REVOLVE | 4.9 | 142.8K | Free |
| Etsy: Shop Home, Style & More | 4.9 | 7.2M | Free |
Questions this record can answer
How was every figure on this page produced?
Each figure is read from public App Store metadata or computed from it, dated to when we read it, and traceable to a stored row. Percentiles, cadence, longevity and sentiment are derived by us; ratings, prices, sizes and dates are taken as the store reports them.
Why can the star average and recent opinion disagree?
The star average is cumulative over the app’s whole life, so recent opinion barely moves it. Any sentiment figure we compute reads only recent review text, which is why it turns first. Treat a divergence as an early indicator, not a verdict.
What can this page not tell you?
Downloads, revenue, active users, subscription pricing inside the app, and anything about security or data handling. None of those are visible in public store metadata, so we do not estimate them.
Provenance
- Source
- Public App Store listing metadata and public customer reviews.
- Collection window
- Last read 7 Aug 2026. Listing re-read daily; reviews re-read on a slower cadence.
- Derived figures
- Percentiles, update cadence, longevity and sentiment are computed by us, not supplied by the store.
- Corrections
- No corrections on this record. Report an error
This record is excluded from search indexes and the sitemap, and carries no advertising. It exists so that figures used in our published analysis can be checked at source. Why we do this