Application record · ID 1669007652
AI Chatbot - Nova
by SCALEUP YAZILIM HIZMETLERI · Productivity · Free
- Average rating
- 4.6
- 124.1K ratings
- Ratings
- 124.1K
- On store since
- 2023
- 3 yrs 115 d
- Languages
- 9
Analyst summary
Last verified 4 Aug 2026AI Chatbot - Nova is a Productivity application published by SCALEUP YAZILIM HIZMETLERI. It holds a 4.6-star average across 124,066 public ratings.
It is actively maintained: the most recent update we observed shipped 28 Jun 2026. The listing has been on the store for 3 yrs 115 d.
On the listing it is localized into 9 languages, a 180 MB download, runs on iPhone 5s and newer · iPad.
Position in category
Each bar shows where AI Chatbot - Nova sits in the distribution of Productivity apps we track. Percentiles are computed over apps with the field observed, not the whole category.
Distribution computed with the category report · Full category report
Review intelligence
High confidenceUsers praise the app's helpfulness and ease of use, but many report issues with billing and the trial period.
It was supposed to be a free 3 day trial they ammedietly tried to charge me 8.47 this is false information. I just put 5 stars so people would see this.
You have 4 messages per day and then you have to upgrade to pro for like $8 per week like bro make it free
Trajectory: stable · recomputed when new reviews arrive · limitations
Health timeline
A dated record of what has actually happened to this app — launch, updates, price moves and record-board milestones. Every point is a stored observation, never an estimate.
- 28 Jun 2026 Update Updated to v4.4.5 The most recent version we observed on the listing.
- 6 Mar 2023 Launch Launched on the App Store Original release date stated on the listing.
Dates are read from the listing and from our own daily observations; the rating curve accrues going forward. How we track.
Listing & advisories
Download size
180 MB
Minimum iOS
15
Devices supported
iPhone 5s and newer · iPad
Age rating
9+
Advisories
Infrequent/Mild Cartoon or Fantasy Violence
Screenshots
8 on the listing
Screenshots are hotlinked from the public store listing and belong to the publisher.
Rankings this app appears on
Peer set
Peers are well-rated apps in Productivity, selected by category and rating — not by similarity of description, so the comparison is like-for-like on scale.
| App | Rating | Ratings | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Chatbot - Nova | 4.6 | 124.1K | Free |
| Granola - AI Meeting Notes | 5.0 | 11.2K | Free |
| Brick - Ditch Distractions | 4.9 | 49.1K | Free |
| Qwen - Assistente IA Alibaba | 4.9 | 1,218 | Free |
| Double Good | 4.9 | 42.7K | Free |
| 番茄ToDo-极简高效自律番茄钟 | 4.9 | 4,808 | Free |
| Foqos - Tap to Block | 4.9 | 4,008 | Free |
Questions this record can answer
How was every figure on this page produced?
Each figure is read from public App Store metadata or computed from it, dated to when we read it, and traceable to a stored row. Percentiles, cadence, longevity and sentiment are derived by us; ratings, prices, sizes and dates are taken as the store reports them.
Why can the star average and recent opinion disagree?
The star average is cumulative over the app’s whole life, so recent opinion barely moves it. Any sentiment figure we compute reads only recent review text, which is why it turns first. Treat a divergence as an early indicator, not a verdict.
What can this page not tell you?
Downloads, revenue, active users, subscription pricing inside the app, and anything about security or data handling. None of those are visible in public store metadata, so we do not estimate them.
Provenance
- Source
- Public App Store listing metadata and public customer reviews.
- Collection window
- Last read 4 Aug 2026. Listing re-read daily; reviews re-read on a slower cadence.
- Derived figures
- Percentiles, update cadence, longevity and sentiment are computed by us, not supplied by the store.
- Corrections
- No corrections on this record. Report an error
This record is excluded from search indexes and the sitemap, and carries no advertising. It exists so that figures used in our published analysis can be checked at source. Why we do this