Application record · ID 1021593933
Medicine Dictionary
by Farlex, Inc. · Medical · Free
- Average rating
- 4.7
- 975 ratings
- Ratings
- 975
- On store since
- 2015
- 10 yrs 75 d
- Languages
- 1
Analyst summary
Last verified 4 Aug 2026Medicine Dictionary is a Medical application published by Farlex, Inc.. It holds a 4.7-star average across 975 public ratings.
It was last updated 20 Nov 2025. The listing has been on the store for 10 yrs 75 d.
On the listing it is a 5.8 MB download, runs on iPhone 5s and newer · iPad.
Position in category
Each bar shows where Medicine Dictionary sits in the distribution of Medical apps we track. Percentiles are computed over apps with the field observed, not the whole category.
Distribution computed with the category report · Full category report
Review intelligence
Medium confidenceUsers find the app very helpful and easy to use for detailed medication information, though some note missing drugs and accuracy issues.
Como un intérprete médico es muy importante tener herramientas cómo está a mano! 10/10 ojalá pudiera agregar opción de traducción con hacer 2 click sobre el nombre de la medicina!
Needs updated and accurate information. Drugs categories are incorrect on some drugs. NDRI's listed as SSRI's, etc...
Trajectory: stable · recomputed when new reviews arrive · limitations
Health timeline
A dated record of what has actually happened to this app — launch, updates, price moves and record-board milestones. Every point is a stored observation, never an estimate.
- 20 Jul 2026 Board Entered Featherweight in Medical Best position observed: #7.
- 20 Nov 2025 Update Updated to v6.0 The most recent version we observed on the listing.
- 8 Sep 2015 Launch Launched on the App Store Original release date stated on the listing.
Dates are read from the listing and from our own daily observations; the rating curve accrues going forward. How we track.
Listing & advisories
Download size
5.8 MB
Minimum iOS
15.0
Devices supported
iPhone 5s and newer · iPad
Age rating
17+
Advisories
Frequent/Intense Medical/Treatment Information
Screenshots
5 on the listing
Screenshots are hotlinked from the public store listing and belong to the publisher.
Rankings this app appears on
Peer set
Peers are well-rated apps in Medical, selected by category and rating — not by similarity of description, so the comparison is like-for-like on scale.
| App | Rating | Ratings | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine Dictionary | 4.7 | 975 | Free |
| Agria | 5.0 | 3,246 | Free |
| Nara Baby & Pregnancy Tracker | 4.9 | 23K | Free |
| MÜV Dispensary | 4.9 | 17.9K | Free |
| Aya Healthcare Job Search | 4.9 | 6,856 | Free |
| Hinge Health | 4.9 | 157K | Free |
| Olá Doutor: Atendimento médico | 4.9 | 10.1K | Free |
Questions this record can answer
How was every figure on this page produced?
Each figure is read from public App Store metadata or computed from it, dated to when we read it, and traceable to a stored row. Percentiles, cadence, longevity and sentiment are derived by us; ratings, prices, sizes and dates are taken as the store reports them.
Why can the star average and recent opinion disagree?
The star average is cumulative over the app’s whole life, so recent opinion barely moves it. Any sentiment figure we compute reads only recent review text, which is why it turns first. Treat a divergence as an early indicator, not a verdict.
What can this page not tell you?
Downloads, revenue, active users, subscription pricing inside the app, and anything about security or data handling. None of those are visible in public store metadata, so we do not estimate them.
Provenance
- Source
- Public App Store listing metadata and public customer reviews.
- Collection window
- Last read 4 Aug 2026. Listing re-read daily; reviews re-read on a slower cadence.
- Derived figures
- Percentiles, update cadence, longevity and sentiment are computed by us, not supplied by the store.
- Corrections
- No corrections on this record. Report an error
This record is excluded from search indexes and the sitemap, and carries no advertising. It exists so that figures used in our published analysis can be checked at source. Why we do this